Todd Zywicki at The Volokh Conspiracy flags this New York Times Magazine story from last weekend on how our agricultural policies are making us fat, and bless him for it. This is one of my policy pet peeves. Michael Pollan, author of The Omnivore’s Dilemma, took to The Times to argue:
the current farm bill helps commodity farmers by cutting them a check based on how many bushels they can grow, rather than, say, by supporting prices and limiting production, as farm bills once did. The result? A food system awash in added sugars (derived from corn) and added fats (derived mainly from soy), as well as dirt-cheap meat and milk (derived from both). By comparison, the farm bill does almost nothing to support farmers growing fresh produce. A result of these policy choices is on stark display in your supermarket, where the real price of fruits and vegetables between 1985 and 2000 increased by nearly 40 percent while the real price of soft drinks (a k a liquid corn) declined by 23 percent. The reason the least healthful calories in the supermarket are the cheapest is that those are the ones the farm bill encourages farmers to grow.
Zywicki concludes:
Rather than the many silly ideas for combatting obesity that we often hear today, one would think that getting rid of farm subsidies for less-healthy foods would make sense, not to mention the budget savings.
Yes, yes, a thousand times yes. I’ve been arguing since the fall that if feminists want to help women with body issues, they should leave the fashion industry and women’s magazines alone and go after the real culprit: Big Ag.
